Multi-level decisions on sensor detection is able to improve the detection performance on the final decision made at the fusion center (FC) in wireless sensor networks (WSN). In this paper, the performance analysis of an M-ary signaling (MS) scheme using analog transmission and a k-bit transmission (KB) scheme is both examined for distributed binary detection. Under the multi-level decision algorithms, each sensor sends a signal carrying the information of a quantized version of a local decision statistic such as the conditional mean or the log-likelihood ratio. In MS, the output of the quantizer is transmitted directly without digitalizing and coding process, while in KB, each quantization output is coded with k bits and hereby a sensor sends a k-bit hard local decision to the FC. At the FC, the linear combiner detection rule on the transmission schemes is both adopted to make the final decision. The effects of the sensor decision and the transmission errors are incorporated in the analysis of the erroneous performance of the final decision. The goal of the proposed schemes is to minimize the final errors at the FC via optimizing the region allocation on the multi-level decision at the sensor. The numerical results illustrate that the proposed schemes achieve significant improvement in error performance over the conventional schemes under either additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel or Rayleigh faded channel.
Published in | International Journal of Information and Communication Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijics.20210602.12 |
Page(s) | 30-37 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Distributed Detection, Multi-level Decision Fusion, Wireless Sensor Networks
[1] | S. Chaudhari, J. Lunden, V. Koivunen, and H. V. Poor, “Cooperative sensing with imperfect reporting channels: Hard decisions or soft decisions?” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 60, no. 1, pp.18-8, January 2012. |
[2] | S. Saha, A. Kumar, Priyanka, and R. Bhattacharya, “An LLR based cooperative spectrum sensing with hard- soft combining for cognitive radio networks,” in 32nd International Union of Radio Science General Assembly Scientific Symposium (URSI GASS), Montreal, Canada, August 2017. |
[3] | A. K. Kattepur, A. T. Hoang, Y.-C. Liang, and M. J. Er, “Data and decision fusion for distributed spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks,” in 2007 6th International Conference on Information, Communications Signal Processing, Singapore, December 2007. |
[4] | Q. Cheng, P. K. Varshney, J. H. Michels, and C. M. Belcastro, “Fault detection in dynamic systems via decision fusion,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 227-242, January 2008. |
[5] | Q. Ling, Z. Tian, and Y. Li, “Distributed decision-making in wireless sensor networks for online structural health monitoring,” Journal of Communications and Networks, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 350-358, August 2009. |
[6] | H. Wang, J. Elson, L. Girod, D. Estrin, and K. Yao, “Target classification and localization in habitat monitoring,” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2003), Hong Kong, China, April 2003. |
[7] | L. Dan, K. D. Wong, H. H. Yu, and A. M. Sayeed, “Detection, classification, and tracking of targets,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 19, pp. 17-29, March 2002. |
[8] | E. Nurellari, D. McLernon, and M. Ghogho, “Distributed two-step quantized fusion rules via consensus algorithm for distributed detection in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 321-335, September 2016. |
[9] | R. S. Blum, “Distributed detection for diversity reception of fading signals in noise,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 158-164, January 1999. |
[10] | P. K. Varshney, Distributed Detection and Data Fusion. New York: Springer, 1997. |
[11] | S. C. A. Thomopoulos, R. Viswanathan, and D. C. Bougoulias, “Optimal decision fusion in multiple sensor systems,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. AES-23, no. 5, pp. 644-653, September 1987. |
[12] | M. Xiang and C. Han, “Global optimization for distributed detection system under the constraint of likelihood ratio quantizers,” in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Fusion, Paris, France, July 2000. |
[13] | M. Xiang and C. Han, “Global optimization for distributed and quantized bayesian detection system,” in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Fusion, Paris, France, July 2000. |
[14] | H. Varaee, G. Mirjalily, and A. Pouramini, “An analytical technique to determine the decision thresholds of multi- bit distributed detection in sensor networks,” in 2009 Second International Conference on Computer and Electrical Engineering, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, December 2009. |
[15] | X. Fan, D. Duan, and L. Yang, “Multi-bit cooperative spectrum sensing strategy in closed form,” in 2013 Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, November 2013. |
[16] | A. M. Aziz, “A simple and efficient suboptimal multilevel quantization approach in geographically distributed sensor systems,” Signal Processing, vol. 88, no. 7, pp. 1698-1714, July 2008. |
[17] | A. M. Aziz, “A soft-decision fusion approach for multiple-sensor distributed binary detection systems,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 2208-2216, July 2011. |
[18] | R. Viswanathan and P. K. Varshney, “Distributed detection with multiple sensors part i. fundamentals,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 54-63, January 1997. |
[19] | Q. Zhang and P. K. Varshney, “Decentralized M- ary detection via hierarchical binary decision fusion,” Information Fusion, vol. 2, pp. 3-16, 2001. |
[20] | M. Longo, T. D. Lookabaugh, and R. M. Gray, “Quantization for decentralized hypothesis testing under communication constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 241-255, March 1990. |
[21] | R. Krzysztofowicz and D. Long, “Fusion of detection probabilities and comparison of multisensor systems,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 665-677, May/June 1990. |
[22] | C. W. Helstrom, “Gradient algorithm for quantization levels in distributed detection systems,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 390-398, January 1995. |
[23] | V. A. Aalo and R. Viswanathan, “Multilevel quantisation and fusion scheme for the decentralised detection of an unknown signal,” IEE Proceedings - Radar, Sonar and Navigation, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 37-44, February 1994. |
[24] | V. Cheng and T. Wang, “Performance Analysis of Distributed Decision Fusion Using A Censoring Scheme in Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology, vol. 59, no.6, pp.2845-2851, July 2010. |
[25] | V. Cheng and T. Wang, “Performance Analysis of Distributed Decision Fusion Using A Multilevel Censoring Scheme in Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp.1610- 1619, May 2012. |
[26] | V. Cheng, T. Wang, and H. Wang, “Distributed Decision Fusion With M-ary Source Coding On Sensor Observation and Uncoded Data Transmission,” in IEEE Consumer Communications & Networking Conference(CCNC), Las Vegas, USA, January 2020. |
APA Style
Victor Wen-Kai Cheng, Tsang-Yi Wang. (2021). Distributed Decision Fusion with M-ary Signaling and k-bit Transmission on Sensor Observation in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Information and Communication Sciences, 6(2), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijics.20210602.12
ACS Style
Victor Wen-Kai Cheng; Tsang-Yi Wang. Distributed Decision Fusion with M-ary Signaling and k-bit Transmission on Sensor Observation in Wireless Sensor Networks. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Sci. 2021, 6(2), 30-37. doi: 10.11648/j.ijics.20210602.12
AMA Style
Victor Wen-Kai Cheng, Tsang-Yi Wang. Distributed Decision Fusion with M-ary Signaling and k-bit Transmission on Sensor Observation in Wireless Sensor Networks. Int J Inf Commun Sci. 2021;6(2):30-37. doi: 10.11648/j.ijics.20210602.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijics.20210602.12, author = {Victor Wen-Kai Cheng and Tsang-Yi Wang}, title = {Distributed Decision Fusion with M-ary Signaling and k-bit Transmission on Sensor Observation in Wireless Sensor Networks}, journal = {International Journal of Information and Communication Sciences}, volume = {6}, number = {2}, pages = {30-37}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijics.20210602.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijics.20210602.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijics.20210602.12}, abstract = {Multi-level decisions on sensor detection is able to improve the detection performance on the final decision made at the fusion center (FC) in wireless sensor networks (WSN). In this paper, the performance analysis of an M-ary signaling (MS) scheme using analog transmission and a k-bit transmission (KB) scheme is both examined for distributed binary detection. Under the multi-level decision algorithms, each sensor sends a signal carrying the information of a quantized version of a local decision statistic such as the conditional mean or the log-likelihood ratio. In MS, the output of the quantizer is transmitted directly without digitalizing and coding process, while in KB, each quantization output is coded with k bits and hereby a sensor sends a k-bit hard local decision to the FC. At the FC, the linear combiner detection rule on the transmission schemes is both adopted to make the final decision. The effects of the sensor decision and the transmission errors are incorporated in the analysis of the erroneous performance of the final decision. The goal of the proposed schemes is to minimize the final errors at the FC via optimizing the region allocation on the multi-level decision at the sensor. The numerical results illustrate that the proposed schemes achieve significant improvement in error performance over the conventional schemes under either additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel or Rayleigh faded channel.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Distributed Decision Fusion with M-ary Signaling and k-bit Transmission on Sensor Observation in Wireless Sensor Networks AU - Victor Wen-Kai Cheng AU - Tsang-Yi Wang Y1 - 2021/05/07 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijics.20210602.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijics.20210602.12 T2 - International Journal of Information and Communication Sciences JF - International Journal of Information and Communication Sciences JO - International Journal of Information and Communication Sciences SP - 30 EP - 37 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1719 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijics.20210602.12 AB - Multi-level decisions on sensor detection is able to improve the detection performance on the final decision made at the fusion center (FC) in wireless sensor networks (WSN). In this paper, the performance analysis of an M-ary signaling (MS) scheme using analog transmission and a k-bit transmission (KB) scheme is both examined for distributed binary detection. Under the multi-level decision algorithms, each sensor sends a signal carrying the information of a quantized version of a local decision statistic such as the conditional mean or the log-likelihood ratio. In MS, the output of the quantizer is transmitted directly without digitalizing and coding process, while in KB, each quantization output is coded with k bits and hereby a sensor sends a k-bit hard local decision to the FC. At the FC, the linear combiner detection rule on the transmission schemes is both adopted to make the final decision. The effects of the sensor decision and the transmission errors are incorporated in the analysis of the erroneous performance of the final decision. The goal of the proposed schemes is to minimize the final errors at the FC via optimizing the region allocation on the multi-level decision at the sensor. The numerical results illustrate that the proposed schemes achieve significant improvement in error performance over the conventional schemes under either additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel or Rayleigh faded channel. VL - 6 IS - 2 ER -